All posts by Steve Tinnelly

Flags, Banners & Signs

The extent to which a HOA may restrict or prohibit homeowners from posting flags, banners and signs depends upon: (1) the nature/content of the flag, banner or sign, (2) its dimensions, and (3) the location where it is to be displayed or posted.

Noncommercial Flags, Banners & Signs Permitted
Civil Code Section 4710 provides homeowners within associations the right to display “noncommercial” signs, posters, flags or banners:

“The governing documents may not prohibit posting or displaying of noncommercial signs, posters, flags, or banners on or in a member’s separate interest, except as required for the protection of public health or safety or if the posting or display would violate a local, state, or federal law.” (Civ. Code § 4710(a).)

Permitted Signage Materials
For the purposes of Section 4710, a noncommercial sign, poster, flag, or banner may be made of “paper, cardboard, cloth, plastic or fabric…but may not be made of lights, roofing, siding, paving materials, flora, or balloons, or any other similar building, landscaping, or decorative component,” nor may it “include the painting of architectural surfaces.” (Civ. Code § 4710(b).)

Permitted Posting Locations
For the purposes of Section 4710, a noncommercial sign, poster, flag or banner “may be posted or displayed from the yard, window, door, balcony, or outside wall of the separate interest.” (Civ. Code §4710(b).)  This language does not necessarily permit homeowners to display noncommercial signs upon any portions of HOA common area (i.e., common area parks or recreational facilities, common area walls surrounding condominium units, etc.).

Permitted Sign Dimensions
Section 4710 does allow for a HOA to prohibit flags, banners and signs that exceed the following dimensions:

Noncommercial Signs and Posters that are more than nine (9) square feet in size may be prohibited. (Civ. Code § 4710(c).)

Noncommercial Flags or Banners that are more than fifteen (15) square feet in size may be prohibited. (Civ. Code § 4710(c).)

Political Signs
Although not explicitly addressed in Section 4710, political signage is generally understood to constitute “noncommercial” signage.  Additionally, pursuant to Civil Code Section 1940.4, it is unlawful for a landlord to prohibit a residential tenant from posting or displaying a political sign or banner. California Courts have analogized HOAs to landlords in certain respects. (See Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn. (1986) 42 Cal.3d 490, 499.)

Commercial Signs & Real Estate Signs
While Section 4710 limits a HOA’s authority to restrict the display or posting of noncommercial signs, its language does not address prohibitions on the display of commercial signs (i.e., a sign advertising a business, promoting a company or individual for profit motives, etc.). By implication, Section 4710 would not impact a HOA’s authority to prohibit or restrict the display of commercial signs. Most sets of HOA governing documents contain restrictions on the commercial use of properties; such restrictions often include language that prohibits commercial signage.

*Exception: Real Estate Signs
Notwithstanding the above, Civil Code Sections 712 and 713 provide homeowners with limited rights to display real estate signs (“For Sale,” “For Rent,” etc.), even though such signs are commercial in nature. (See “Real Estate Signs.”)

Number of Signs
Section 4710 does not address the number of noncommercial signs that may be displayed by a particular homeowner. However, in the case of Fourth La Costa v. Seith, the California Court of Appeal “[saw] no problem with allowing only one sign per unit, or requiring that signs be removed within three days of a lease or sale.” (Fourth La Costa v. Seith (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 563, 581.) Though that case pertained to real estate signs, the Court’s reasoning could similarly apply to restrictions on the number of noncommercial signs.

U.S. Flags
Civil Code Section 4705 contains similar protections for homeowners displaying a flag of the United States, as well as similar restrictions on permissible flag materials and display locations. However, unlike Section 4710, Section 4705 does not contain language addressing the permissible dimensions of U.S. flags.

Religious Items on Doors
Civil Code sections 1940.45 and 4706 grant members the right to display religious items on the entry doors and door frames to their respective units, subject to certain limitations. (See “Religious Items on Doors.”)

Related Links

Who’s Yard is it Anyway? Part I: Homeowner’s Speech
– Published on HOA Lawyer Blog (March 2025)

Civil Code Section 1940.4. Display of Political Signs; Tenant Protections.

(a) Except as provided in subdivision (c), a landlord shall not prohibit a tenant from posting or displaying political signs relating to any of the following:

(1) An election or legislative vote, including an election of a candidate to public office.

(2) The initiative, referendum, or recall process.

(3) Issues that are before a public commission, public board, or elected local body for a vote.

(b) Political signs may be posted or displayed in the window or on the door of the premises leased by the tenant in a multifamily dwelling, or from the yard, window, door, balcony, or outside wall of the premises leased by a tenant of a single-family dwelling.

(c) A landlord may prohibit a tenant from posting or displaying political signs in the following circumstances:

(1) The political sign is more than six square feet in size.

(2) The posting or displaying would violate a local, state, or federal law.

(3) The posting or displaying would violate a lawful provision in a common interest development governing a document that satisfies the criteria of Section 1353.6.

(d) A tenant shall post and remove political signs in compliance with the time limits set by the ordinance for the jurisdiction where the premises are located. A tenant shall be solely responsible for any violation of a local ordinance. If no local ordinance exists or if the local ordinance does not include a time limit for posting and removing political signs on private property, the landlord may establish a reasonable time period for the posting and removal of political signs. A reasonable time period for this purpose shall begin at least 90 days prior to the date of the election or vote to which the sign relates and end at least 15 days following the date of the election or vote.

(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any changes in the terms of a tenancy that are made to implement the provisions of this section and are noticed pursuant to Section 827 shall not be deemed to cause a diminution in housing services, and may be enforced in accordance with Section 1161 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Commercial Use & Home Businesses

An association has the general authority to restrict or prohibit the operation of commercial and business activities inside its members’ separate interests (in or upon their respective units or lots). Such restrictions and prohibitions are almost always contained in an association’s governing documents (i.e., in its CC&Rs) from the time the association was originally developed. Those provisions often define “commercial” in a broad sense to include any business, commercial, manufacturing, mercantile, storing, vending or other such non-residential purpose.

The intent behind such provisions are to reduce the burdens placed upon association common areas (i.e., customers/employees parking in the HOA’s streets or parking spaces), and to prevent commercial activities from becoming a nuisance to neighboring homeowners and the HOA in general. Municipal ordinances and laws that permit the operation of home-based business do not necessarily supersede conflicting provisions in an association’s governing documents unless they explicitly state that they do.

Interpretation of CC&R Restrictions & Judicial Deference
CC&R provisions that prohibit and restrict commercial uses and home businesses are often drafted broadly. Courts may grant judicial deference to a decision made by an association’s board of directors as to whether alleged business activity violates those restrictions:

“The trial court properly deferred to the Board’s discretionary decision that the Ketelhuts’ operation of the vineyard did not violate the prohibition against business or commercial activity because it did not affect the community’s residential character.” (Eith v. Ketelhut (2018) 31 Cal.App.5th 1, 17.)

Residential Care Facilities, Sober Living Homes & Day Care Homes
An association is limited in its ability to restrict and prohibit homeowners from operating residential care facilities (i.e., sober living homes) and day care centers out of their homes. (See “Residential Care Facilities,” “Family Day Care Homes” and “Alcohol or Drug Abuse Recovery or Treatment Facilities.)

Commercial Signage
Civil Code Section 4710 affords homeowners with rights to display “noncommercial” signage on their separate interests. Even where an association does not have a restriction on commercial use, it may still have the authority to prohibit the display of commercial signage on a homeowner’s lot or unit. (See “Flags, Banners & Signs.”)

Pet Restrictions

No Flat Prohibitions
In 1994, the California Supreme Court upheld the validity of a CC&R restriction that broadly prohibited homeowners from having pets in their units. (See Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village (1994) 8 Cal.4th 361.) Several years after that decision, the California Legislature enacted Civil Code Section 1360.5 (now Civil Code Section 4715) to afford homeowners within associations the limited right to keep and maintain at least one (1) pet.  However, as written, Section 4715 does not affect the validity of a pet prohibition contained in an association’s governing documents that has not been “entered into, amended, or otherwise modified” on or after January 1, 2001. (Civ. Code § 4715(e).) This created an ambiguity as to whether Section 4715 applies only to situations where the specific governing document containing the pet prohibition (i.e., the CC&Rs) was amended after 2001, or whether Section 4715 would apply if any governing document of the association was amended or modified after 2001 (i.e., the bylaws, operating rules, etc.).

This ambiguity became especially significant upon the adoption of Civil Code Section 1363.03 (now Civil Code Section 5105) in 2006 that required all associations to adopt election rules. Because election rules are “operating rules” within the meaning of Civil Code Section 4355, they constitute a component of the association’s governing documents for the purposes of Section 4715. (Civ. Code  § 4715(d).) Thus, there was a concern that Section 1363.03 (now Section 5105) requiring associations to adopt election rules served to effectively nullify any existing pet prohibitions.

To address this concern, in 2007, Senator Kuehl requested that the California Office of Legislative Counsel (COLC) review this ambiguity and provide some guidance. On July 19, 2007, COLC rendered an opinion that the adoption of election rules pursuant to Section 1363.03 would indeed void pet prohibitions contained in other provisions of an association’s governing documents. The COLC opinion states in pertinent part that:

“…it is our opinion that, under Section 1363.05 of the Civil Code, the adoption of a rule by a common interest development to comply with the election requirements of Section 1363.03 of the Civil Code renders unenforceable a provision of the governing documents of that development that prohibits the keeping of at least one pet.”

While the COLC opinion does not have the weight of law or legal precedent, it does illustrate how courts may interpret Section 4715 moving forward. The HOA industry took notice of the COLC opinion, and the general consensus among HOA attorneys is that flat prohibitions on pets are no longer enforceable.

Reasonable Restrictions Permitted
The rights afforded to homeowners under Section 4715 are “subject to reasonable rules and regulations of the association.” (Civ. Code § 4715(a).) Rules and regulations utilized by associations in this respect typically include restrictions on the type of breed, size (weight), and number of pets that a homeowner may have.  Additionally, associations often enact operating rules that regulate pets entering into the association’s common areas (i.e., rules requiring pets to be leashed when in common area streets, parks, hallways, etc.).

Companion & Service Animals
An association’s authority to regulate and restrict pets is also subject to Federal and State laws prohibiting discrimination against persons with disabilities. Those laws may require an association in particular circumstances to exempt a disabled owner’s pet from having to comply with the association’s otherwise reasonable pet restrictions.

Bank Loans to HOAs

Authority to Obtain Loan
A HOA’s authority to obtain a loan (borrow money) is generally contained within the provisions of its governing documents—typically its CC&Rs or bylaws. Where such provisions are absent, the authority to obtain a loan is found in Corporations Code Section 7140(i). Section 7140(i) allows corporations to borrow money, subject to any limitations contained in the corporation’s articles or bylaws.

Membership Approval Requirements
Many sets of HOA governing documents contain provisions that require membership approval in connection with obtaining a bank loan for the HOA. Those approval requirements could extend to any of the following issues:

Qualification Issues
In order for a HOA to be approved for a bank loan, banks often require the HOA to provide the following items of information:

  • Financial statements and other information regarding the HOA’s overall financial health (i.e., number of delinquencies)
  • Verification that the HOA carries all of the insurance policies required under its CC&Rs
  • Verification that the HOA is in “good standing” with the California Secretary of State (i.e., filing income tax returns and paying taxes)
  • An written opinion from the HOA’s attorney verifying that the HOA has the authority to obtain the desired loan.