(a) Any employer or collective bargaining representative of an employee who has suffered harassment, unlawful violence, or a credible threat of violence from any individual, that can reasonably be construed to be carried out or to have been carried out at the workplace, may seek a temporary restraining order and an order after hearing on behalf of the employee and, at the discretion of the court, any number of other employees at the workplace, and, if appropriate, other employees at other workplaces of the employer. For purposes of this section only, a person may bring a petition for a temporary restraining order and an order after hearing on behalf of an employee as their collective bargaining representative only if the person serves as a collective bargaining representative for that employee in employment or labor matters at the employee’s workplace.
(b) For purposes of this section:
(1) “Course of conduct” is a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose, including following or stalking an employee to or from the place of work; entering the workplace; following an employee during hours of employment; making telephone calls to an employee; or sending correspondence to an employee by any means, including, but not limited to, the use of the public or private mails, interoffice mail, facsimile, or computer email.
(2) “Credible threat of violence” is a knowing and willful statement or course of conduct that would place a reasonable person in fear for their safety, or the safety of their immediate family, and that serves no legitimate purpose.
(3) “Employer” and “employee” mean persons defined in Section 350 of the Labor Code. “Employer” also includes a federal agency, the state, a state agency, a city, county, or district, and a private, public, or quasi-public corporation, or any public agency thereof or therein. “Employee” also includes the members of boards of directors of private, public, and quasi-public corporations and elected and appointed public officers. For purposes of this section only, “employee” also includes a volunteer or independent contractor who performs services for the employer at the employer’s worksite.
(4) “Harassment” is a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, or harasses the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose. The course of conduct must be that which would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and must actually cause substantial emotional distress.
(5) “Petitioner” means the employer or collective bargaining representative that petitions under subdivision (a) for a temporary restraining order and order after hearing.
(6) “Respondent” means the person against whom the temporary restraining order and order after hearing are sought and, if the petition is granted, the restrained person.
(7) “Temporary restraining order” and “order after hearing” mean orders that include any of the following restraining orders, whether issued ex parte or after notice and hearing:
(A) An order enjoining a party from harassing, intimidating, molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, abusing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, or coming within a specified distance of, or disturbing the peace of, the employee.
(B) An order enjoining a party from specified behavior that the court determines is necessary to effectuate orders described in subparagraph (A).
(8) “Unlawful violence” is any assault or battery, or stalking as prohibited in Section 646.9 of the Penal Code, but shall not include lawful acts of self-defense or defense of others.
(c) This section does not permit a court to issue a temporary restraining order or order after hearing prohibiting speech or other activities that are constitutionally protected, protected by the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. Sec. 151 et seq.), protected by Chapter 11.5 (commencing with Section 3555) of Division 4 of Title 1 of the Government Code, or otherwise protected by Section 527.3 or any other provision of law.
(d) In the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, a temporary restraining order or order after hearing issued under this section may include other named family or household members, or other persons employed at the employee’s workplace or workplaces.
(e) Before filing a petition under this section, an employer or collective bargaining representative of an employee shall provide the employee who has suffered harassment, unlawful violence, or a credible threat of violence from any individual, an opportunity to decline to be named in the temporary restraining order. An employee’s request to not be named in the temporary restraining order shall not prohibit an employer or collective bargaining representative from seeking a temporary restraining order on behalf of other employees at the workplace, and, if appropriate, other employees at other workplaces of the employer.
(f)
(1) Upon filing a petition under this section, the petitioner may obtain a temporary restraining order in accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 527, if the petitioner also files a declaration that, to the satisfaction of the court, shows one of the following:
(A) Reasonable proof that an employee has suffered unlawful violence or a credible threat of violence by the respondent, and that great or irreparable harm would result to an employee.
(B) Clear and convincing evidence of all of the following:
(i) That an employee has suffered harassment by the respondent.
(ii) That great or irreparable harm would result to an employee.
(iii) That the course of conduct at issue served no legitimate purpose.
(iv) That the issuance of the order is not prohibited by subdivision (c).
(2) The temporary restraining order may include any of the protective orders described in paragraph (7) of subdivision (b).
(g) A request for the issuance of a temporary restraining order without notice under this section shall be granted or denied on the same day that the petition is submitted to the court, unless the petition is filed too late in the day to permit effective review, in which case the order shall be granted or denied on the next day of judicial business in sufficient time for the order to be filed that day with the clerk of the court.
(h) A temporary restraining order granted under this section shall remain in effect, at the court’s discretion, for a period not to exceed 21 days, or if the court extends the time for hearing under subdivision (i), not to exceed 25 days, unless otherwise modified or terminated by the court.
(i) Within 21 days, or if good cause appears to the court, 25 days from the date that a petition for a temporary order is granted or denied, a hearing shall be held on the petition. If no request for temporary orders is made, the hearing shall be held within 21 days, or, if good cause appears to the court, 25 days, from the date that the petition is filed.
(j) The respondent may file a response that explains, excuses, justifies, or denies the alleged harassment, unlawful violence, or credible threats of violence.
(k) At the hearing, the judge shall receive any testimony that is relevant and may make an independent inquiry. Moreover, if the respondent is currently employed by the employer of the employee, as described in subdivision (a), the judge shall receive evidence concerning the employer’s decision to retain, terminate, or otherwise discipline the respondent. If the judge finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent engaged in harassment, engaged in unlawful violence, or made a credible threat of violence, an order shall issue prohibiting further harassment, unlawful violence, or threats of violence.
(l)
(1) In the discretion of the court, an order issued after notice and hearing under this section may have a duration of not more than three years, subject to termination or modification by further order of the court either on written stipulation filed with the court or on the motion of a party. These orders may be renewed, upon the request of a party, for a duration of not more than three years, without a showing of any further harassment, unlawful violence, or credible threats of violence since the issuance of the original order, subject to termination or modification by further order of the court either on written stipulation filed with the court or on the motion of a party. The request for renewal may be brought at any time within the three months before the expiration of the order.
(2) The failure to state the expiration date on the face of the form creates an order with a duration of three years from the date of issuance.
(3) If an action is filed for the purpose of terminating or modifying a protective order prior to the expiration date specified in the order by a party other than the protected party, the party who is protected by the order shall be given notice, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1005, of the proceeding by personal service or, if the protected party has satisfied the requirements of Chapter 3.1 (commencing with Section 6205) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, by service on the Secretary of State. If the party who is protected by the order cannot be notified prior to the hearing for modification or termination of the protective order, the court shall deny the motion to modify or terminate the order without prejudice or continue the hearing until the party who is protected can be properly noticed and may, upon a showing of good cause, specify another method for service of process that is reasonably designed to afford actual notice to the protected party. The protected party may waive their right to notice if they are physically present in court and does not challenge the sufficiency of the notice.
(m) This section does not preclude any party from representation by private counsel or from appearing on the party’s own behalf.
(n) Upon filing of a petition under this section, the respondent shall be personally served with a copy of the petition, temporary restraining order, if any, and notice of hearing of the petition. Service shall be made at least five days before the hearing. The court may, for good cause, on motion of the petitioner or on its own motion, shorten the time for service on the respondent.
(o) A notice of hearing under this section shall notify the respondent that, if they do not attend the hearing, the court may make orders against them that could last up to three years.
(p) The respondent shall be entitled, as a matter of course, to one continuance, for a reasonable period, to respond to the petition.
(q)
(1) Any party may request a continuance of the hearing, which the court shall grant on a showing of good cause. The request may be made in writing before or at the hearing or orally at the hearing. The court may also grant a continuance on its own motion.
(2) If the court grants a continuance, any temporary restraining order that has been granted shall remain in effect until the end of the continued hearing, unless otherwise ordered by the court. In granting a continuance, the court may modify or terminate a temporary restraining order.
(r)
(1) If a respondent, named in a restraining order issued under this section after a hearing, has not been served personally with the order but has received actual notice of the existence and substance of the order through personal appearance in court to hear the terms of the order from the court, no additional proof of service is required for enforcement of the order.
(2) If the respondent named in a temporary restraining order is personally served with the order and notice of hearing with respect to a restraining order or protective order based on the temporary restraining order, but the person does not appear at the hearing, either personally or by an attorney, and the terms and conditions of the restraining order or protective order issued at the hearing are identical to the temporary restraining order, except for the duration of the order, then the restraining order or protective order issued at the hearing may be served on the person by first-class mail sent to that person at the most current address for the person available to the court.
(3) The Judicial Council form for temporary orders issued pursuant to this subdivision shall contain a statement in substantially the following form:
“If you have been personally served with this temporary restraining order and notice of hearing, but you do not appear at the hearing either in person or by a lawyer, and a restraining order that is the same as this restraining order except for the expiration date is issued at the hearing, a copy of the order will be served on you by mail at the following address: ____.
If that address is not correct or you wish to verify that the temporary restraining order was converted to a restraining order at the hearing without substantive change and to find out the duration of that order, contact the clerk of the court.”
(s)
(1) Information on a temporary restraining order or order after hearing relating to workplace violence issued by a court pursuant to this section shall be transmitted to the Department of Justice in accordance with either paragraph (2) or (3).
(2) The court shall order the petitioner or the attorney for the petitioner to deliver a copy of any order issued under this section, or a reissuance, extension, modification, or termination of the order, and any subsequent proof of service, by the close of the business day on which the order, reissuance, extension, modification, or termination was made, to each law enforcement agency having jurisdiction over the residence of the petitioner and to any additional law enforcement agencies within the court’s discretion as are requested by the petitioner.
(3) Alternatively, the court or its designee shall transmit, within one business day, to law enforcement personnel all information required under subdivision (b) of Section 6380 of the Family Code regarding any order issued under this section, or a reissuance, extension, modification, or termination of the order, and any subsequent proof of service, by either one of the following methods:
(A) Transmitting a physical copy of the order or proof of service to a local law enforcement agency authorized by the Department of Justice to enter orders into the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS).
(B) With the approval of the Department of Justice, entering the order or proof of service into CLETS directly.
(4) Each appropriate law enforcement agency shall make available information as to the existence and current status of these orders to law enforcement officers responding to the scene of reported harassment, unlawful violence, or a credible threat of violence.
(5) At the request of the petitioner, an order issued under this section shall be served on the respondent, regardless of whether the respondent has been taken into custody, by any law enforcement officer who is present at the scene of reported harassment, unlawful violence, or a credible threat of violence involving the parties to the proceedings. The petitioner shall provide the officer with an endorsed copy of the order and proof of service that the officer shall complete and send to the issuing court.
(6) Upon receiving information at the scene of an incident of harassment, unlawful violence, or a credible threat of violence that a protective order has been issued under this section, or that a person who has been taken into custody is the subject of an order, if the petitioner or the protected person cannot produce an endorsed copy of the order, a law enforcement officer shall immediately attempt to verify the existence of the order.
(7) If the law enforcement officer determines that a protective order has been issued but not served, the officer shall immediately notify the respondent of the terms of the order and obtain the respondent’s address. The law enforcement officer shall at that time also enforce the order, but may not arrest or take the respondent into custody for acts in violation of the order that were committed prior to the verbal notice of the terms and conditions of the order. The law enforcement officer’s verbal notice of the terms of the order shall constitute service of the order and constitutes sufficient notice for the purposes of this section and for the purposes of Section 29825 of the Penal Code. The petitioner shall mail an endorsed copy of the order to the respondent’s mailing address provided to the law enforcement officer within one business day of the reported incident of harassment, unlawful violence, or a credible threat of violence at which a verbal notice of the terms of the order was provided by a law enforcement officer.
(t)
(1) A person subject to a protective order issued under this section shall not own, possess, purchase, receive, or attempt to purchase or receive a firearm or ammunition while the protective order is in effect.
(2) The court shall order a person subject to a protective order issued under this section to relinquish any firearms they own or possess pursuant to Section 527.9.
(3) Every person who owns, possesses, purchases or receives, or attempts to purchase or receive a firearm or ammunition while the protective order is in effect is punishable pursuant to Section 29825 of the Penal Code.
(u) Any intentional disobedience of any temporary restraining order or order after hearing granted under this section is punishable pursuant to Section 273.6 of the Penal Code.
(v) This section shall not be construed as expanding, diminishing, altering, or modifying the duty, if any, of an employer to provide a safe workplace for employees and other persons.
(w)
(1) The Judicial Council shall develop forms, instructions, and rules for relating to matters governed by this section. The forms for the petition and response shall be simple and concise, and their use by parties in actions brought pursuant to this section shall be mandatory.
(2) A temporary restraining order or order after hearing relating to harassment, unlawful violence, or a credible threat of violence issued by a court pursuant to this section shall be issued on forms adopted by the Judicial Council and that have been approved by the Department of Justice pursuant to subdivision (i) of Section 6380 of the Family Code. However, the fact that an order issued by a court pursuant to this section was not issued on forms adopted by the Judicial Council and approved by the Department of Justice shall not, in and of itself, make the order unenforceable.
(x) There is no filing fee for a petition that alleges that a person has inflicted or threatened violence against an employee employed or represented by the petitioner, or stalked the employee, or acted or spoken in any other manner that has placed the employee in reasonable fear of violence, and that seeks a protective or restraining order restraining stalking or future violence or threats of violence, in any action brought pursuant to this section. A fee shall not be paid for a subpoena filed in connection with a petition alleging these acts. A fee shall not be paid for filing a response to a petition alleging these acts.
(y)
(1) Subject to paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 6103.2 of the Government Code, there shall be no fee for the service of process by a sheriff or marshal of a temporary restraining order or order after hearing to be issued pursuant to this section if either of the following conditions applies:
(A) The temporary restraining order or order after hearing issued pursuant to this section is based upon stalking, as prohibited by Section 646.9 of the Penal Code.
(B) The temporary restraining order or order after hearing issued pursuant to this section is based on unlawful violence or a credible threat of violence.
(2) The Judicial Council shall prepare and develop forms for persons who wish to avail themselves of the services described in this subdivision.
(z) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2025.
Would reverse the Right to Repair Act by requiring proof of damage caused by a known defect before a claim may be pursued, shifting investigative and repair costs to homeowners.
Current Status: Pending
FindHOALaw Quick Summary:
Existing law specifies the rights and requirements of a homeowner to bring an action for construction defects, including applicable standards for home construction, the statute of limitations, the burden of proof, the damages recoverable, and detailed prelitigation procedures.
This bill would establish an alternative process for certified buildings, as established by the bill. The bill would authorize a builder to obtain a certified building status for a building by undergoing private inspection, repairs, and reinspection during construction and would require the inspector to be a private licensed architect, engineer, or general contractor. The bill would prohibit future challenges to the status of the building as a certified building once certified. The bill would authorize the builder of a certified building to establish its own process for handling postconstruction claims. The bill would specify that a builder has a complete and unrestricted right to inspect and repair a certified building at times mutually agreed upon by the builder and claimant and within timeframes established by the builder. If a claimant refuses the offer of repair or prevents, restricts, delays, or frustrates access for more than 7 days from the mutually agreed upon day, the bill would deem the builder to have received a release.
Existing law requires a person claiming that the construction of their residence violates standards of construction to provide a written notice of the claim to the builder that, among other things, describes the claimed violation in reasonable detail sufficient to determine the nature and location of the claimed violation. Existing law authorizes that written notice to be provided by the claimant’s legal representative.
This bill would amend Civil Code Section 910 to require additional information to be included in the notice, including, at a minimum, a description of the observable evidence of the damage believed to result from a violation, copies of any reasonably available photographs, estimates or reports relating to the damage, and the room within the home or unit in which that evidence may be found. The bill, in case of a group of homeowners or a homeowner’s association, would require the notice to be signed by each affected homeowner and for claims involving common areas, to be verified by the president of the association.
Civil Code Section 926 prohibits a builder from obtaining a release or waiver in exchange for repair work mandated by law and authorizes a claimant, at the conclusion of the repair, to file an action for violation of the applicable standard or for a claim of inadequate repair.
This bill would repeal that provision.
Existing law authorizes the builder to make a cash offer and no repair, and authorizes the builder to obtain a reasonable release in exchange for the cash payment.
This bill would amend Civil Code Section 929 to authorize the builder to obtain a release related to the claims asserted in the above-described notice in exchange for either a cash payment or repair, including a full and general release.
Existing law specifies that the prelitigation procedures are to be strictly construed, and that, if the claimant does not conform with the requirements, the builder may bring a motion to stay any subsequent court action or other proceeding until the requirements are met.
This bill would amend Civil Code Section 930 to authorize the builder to bring a motion to dismiss any court action or other proceeding and would require the court to grant the motion.
Existing law specifies that to make a claim for violation of construction standards applicable to construction defect claims, a homeowner need only demonstrate that the home does not meet the applicable standard, and that no further showing of causation or damages is required to meet the burden of proof, provided that the violation arises out of, pertains to, or is related to, the original construction.
This bill would amend Civil Code Section 942 to require a claimant to affirmatively demonstrate that there is a violation of the applicable standard, that the violation caused appreciable, nonspeculative, present physical damage to another component part of the building, and that the violation is caused by the original construction. The bill would specify that only specified construction defect provisions in the Civil Code are the exclusive remedy for any claim or action seeking recovery of damages arising out of residential construction, design specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction. The bill would prohibit an insurer from asserting repairs as a voluntary payment or as a payment made without the insurer’s consent, or deny counting the costs associated with those repairs.
Existing law authorizes a homeowner to recover reasonable investigative costs for each established violation.
This bill would amend Civil Code Section 944 to delete that provision, and would prohibit the recovery of investigative costs. The bill would prohibit an action from being filed unless the conditions for filing an action have been met for each claimed violation. The bill would prohibit a claim for damages based on extrapolation of claims, and would limit testing of the components of the structure.
Existing law authorizes a common interest development association to institute, defend, settle, or intervene in litigation, arbitration, mediation, or administrative proceedings in matters pertaining to damage to a separate interest that the association is obligated to repair or that arises out of, or is integrally related to, damage to a separate interest that the association is obligated to maintain or repair.
This bill would amend Civil Code Section 5980 to exclude construction defect claims from that authorization to pursue claims for damage to separate interests.
Existing law requires the board of directors of an association, within 30 days before filing a civil action against the developer of a common interest development for certain damages, to provide a written notice to each member of the association.
This bill would amend Civil Code Section 6150 to require the notice to also include a statement, in 12-point bold type, that states, among other things, that the filing of a civil action may affect the value of the residence and the ability to sell the residence or refinance a mortgage. The bill would also require the board to provide a courtesy copy of each notice to each member to the builder. The bill would state that an association and its officers and directors shall not be liable for breach of fiduciary duty for not filing a claim or action, as specified.
View more info on AB 1903
from the California Legislature's website
Would expand list of exceptions for the $100 fine cap.
Current Status: Pending
FindHOALaw Quick Summary:
Existing law requires the board of an association, if the association adopts or has adopted a policy imposing any monetary penalty on any association member for a violation of the governing documents, to adopt and distribute to each member a schedule of the monetary penalties that may be assessed for those violations. Existing law prohibits a monetary penalty for a violation of the governing documents from exceeding the lesser of the amount stated in the schedule that is in effect at the time of the violation or $100 per violation, except if the violation might result in an adverse health or safety impact on the common area or another association member’s property.
This bill would amend Civil Code Section 5850 to remove the exception if the violation might result in an adverse health or safety impact on the common area or another association member’s property, and would, instead, except if the violation might result in, among other things, certain fire or environmental hazards, including the storage of any flammable or combustible material in a common area.
Existing law requires the board to notify a member in writing at least 10 days before a meeting to consider or impose discipline or a monetary charge on a member. Existing law requires the board to give a member the opportunity to cure a violation prior to the meeting, and prohibits the board from imposing discipline if the member cures the violation prior to the meeting or, if curing the violation would take longer than the time between the notice provided and the meeting, the member provides financial commitment to cure the violation.
This bill would amend Civil Code Section 5855 to specify that a member engaged in habitual, repeated, or continuing violations is not deemed to have cured a violation simply because the violation is not occurring at the time of the hearing.
**AB-2579 was amended on April 30, 2026, to remove the list of violations that may result in a fine greater than $100, and to require the Department of Real Estate to develop and publish the list. The list would be limited to violations that address significant risks to health, safety, or the integrity of the CID:
(d) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the board may impose a penalty stated in the schedule of monetary penalties or supplement that is in effect at the time of the violation that is greater than one hundred dollars ($100) per violation, if the violation may result in any of the following: either of the following apply to the violation:
(A) The violation may result in an adverse health or safety impact on the common area or another association member’s property.
(B) The violation is contained in the list developed and published by the Department of Real Estate pursuant to Section 5851.
(2) Before imposing a penalty on a violation pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), the board shall make a written finding specifying the adverse health or safety impact in a board meeting open to the members.
View more info on AB 2579
from the California Legislature's website
Would add a special district with water conservation authority to the entities that may enforce the provisions requiring the use of recycled water to irrigate of nonfunctional turf.
Current Status: Pending
FindHOALaw Quick Summary:
Existing law prohibits the use of potable water for the irrigation of nonfunctional turf located on commercial, industrial, and institutional properties, other than a cemetery, and on properties of homeowners’ associations, common interest developments, and community service organizations or similar entities, as specified. Existing law requires a person or entity to be subject to civil liability or penalties by the State Water Resources Control Board, as prescribed, or to civil liability and penalties imposed by an urban water supplier, pursuant to a locally adopted ordinance or policy. Existing law authorizes a public water system, city, county, or city and county to enforce the provisions relating to the prohibition, as specified.
This bill would amend Water Code 10608.14 to require a person or entity to also be subject to civil liability or penalties imposed by a special district with water conservation enforcement authority pursuant to a locally adopted ordinance or policy. The bill would authorize a special district with water conservation enforcement authority to enforce the provisions relating to the prohibition.
**SB-1139 was amended on March 23, 2026, to limit its scope to the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District.
(f) Noncompliance by a person or entity with this chapter or regulations adopted thereunder shall be subject to civil liability and penalties set forth in Section 1846, or to civil liability and penalties imposed by an urban retail water supplier or special district with water conservation enforcement authority the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District pursuant to a locally adopted ordinance or policy.
(g) (1) A public water system, special district with water conservation enforcement authority, the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District, a city, county, or city and county may enforce the provisions of this chapter.
View more info on SB 1139
from the California Legislature's website
Would require the association to funds reserves in at least the minimum reserve contribution level as specified in the reserve study.
Current Status: Pending
FindHOALaw Quick Summary:
The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (“Act”) governs the management and operation of common interest developments, and requires an association to manage a common interest development, including requiring the association to levy regular and special assessments sufficient to perform its obligations, subject to specified limitations on increases in those assessments. The Act requires an association to distribute an annual budget report 30 to 90 days before the end of its fiscal year. Under existing law, that budget report includes, among other things, a summary of the association’s reserve accounts. The Act requires an association to perform a study of the reserve account requirements, and, as part of that study, cause to be conducted a visual inspection of the accessible areas of major components that the association is obligated to repair, replace, restore, or maintain.
This bill would, beginning January 1, 2032, amend Civil Code Section 5550 to revise the requirement to perform a study of the reserve account requirements to, among other things, include the minimum reserve contribution level to prevent the projected association reserve account balance from falling below zero over the following 30 years.
The bill would add Civil Code Section 5552 to require an association to fund the reserve account on an annual basis in at least the minimum reserve contribution level. If the association is unable to fund the reserve account in at least the minimum reserve contribution level without exceeding the above-described specified limitations on increases on assessments, then, notwithstanding those specified limitations, the bill would require the association to levy a reserve special assessment in an amount necessary to allow the association to fund to minimum contribution level without a reserve special assessment within 3 fiscal years, as provided.
**AB-2050 was amended on April 16, 2026, to limit a reserve funding special assessment to no more than once every nine years:
(b) (1) If the association is unable to fund the reserve account in at least the minimum reserve contribution level without exceeding the limitations on assessment increases set forth in Section 5605, then, notwithstanding Section 5605, the association shall levy a reserve special assessment in an amount necessary to allow the association to fund to minimum contribution level without a reserve special assessment within three nine fiscal years.
(2) All funds collected through the reserve special assessment shall be deposited in the association’s reserve account and considered reserve funds. The amount of the reserve funding special assessment shall be the amount necessary to prevent the projected association reserve account balance from falling below zero over the following 30 years.
(3) An association shall not levy a reserve funding special assessment more than once every three nine years.
**AB-2050 was amended June 18, 2026 to require the association to transfer 15% of it gross annual budget to its reserve account each year if the association’s reserve balance is projected to fall below zero at any time over the following 30 years:
(b) If an association’s reserve account balance is projected pursuant to paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) of Section 5550 to fall below zero at any time over the following 30 years, the association shall transfer a minimum of 15 percent of its gross annual budget to its reserve account each year until its reserve account balance is no longer to projected to fall below zero.
(b)(c) (1) If the association is unable to fund the reserve account in at least the minimum reserve contribution level without exceeding the limitations on assessment increases set forth in Section 5605, then, notwithstanding Section 5605, under subdivision (b) through its gross annual budget, the association shall levy a reserve funding special assessment in an amount necessary to allow the association to fund to minimum contribution level without a reserve special assessment within nine fiscal years. subject to the same provisions as a standard special assessment in Section 5605.
(2) If the reserve funding special assessment amount in paragraph (1) is insufficient to meet the minimum reserve contribution level due to the cap on special assessments without a vote, the association shall have the membership vote on approving an amount exceeding the cap that is necessary to fund the minimum level.
View more info on AB 2050
from the California Legislature's website
